Mary’s response (to my note below)
Phil – You are so nice to set your ideas forth. This one really resonates with me:
It’s that signal from nature of strain on the resource that we need to read differently. We’ve been reading it backwards, essentially. We’ve been seeing it as a signal of where to do things so our systems can continue multiplying.
We need change that to reading it as a signal of “enough”
…..and point to how to set holistic targets for where everything connected should stabilize.
Of course, to do that you need to break the growth imperative, which would mean going through the struggle of figuring out how to talk about it. It’s all about continually multiplying opportunity inevitably leasing to trouble too, after all. Continue reading Signal from nature of strain