Reconstructing a sampled composite function (full size)



back

To test the DR method a sin curve is 'disguised' by superimposing two other sin curves of higher frequency and then sampling values from the composite to see if the components can then be reconstructed.

Normal curve fitting methods would treat the data produced this way as statistically distributed around a single function, probably producing a straight line and a random variable. A keen observer would note the cyclic pattern in the data and might separate these very regular components. DR works just as well when the data is real, with irregular, asymmetric and transient underlying processes to be separated out.

The figures display the compound sin curve test procedure in12 steps:
(open two browsers to view figures side-by-side)

fig1
fig2
fig3
fig4
fig5
fig6
fig7
fig8
fig9
fig10
fig11
fig12
  • 1. Selecting three regular mathematical functions,Three sin curves
  • fig1
    fig2
    fig3
    fig4
    fig5
    fig6
    fig7
    fig8
    fig9
    fig10
    fig11
    fig12

    2. The composite to be sampled

     
    fig1
    fig2
    fig3
    fig4
    fig5
    fig6
    fig7
    fig8
    fig9
    fig10
    fig11
    fig12
    Sampling of the combined functions
    fig1
    fig2
    fig3
    fig4
    fig5
    fig6
    fig7
    fig8
    fig9
    fig10
    fig11
    fig12
  • 4. A graph of the selected points,
  • fig1
    fig2
    fig3
    fig4
    fig5
    fig6
    fig7
    fig8
    fig9
    fig10
    fig11
    fig12
  • 5. Derivative interpolation of the data and location of its inflection points,
  • fig1
    fig2
    fig3
    fig4
    fig5
    fig6
    fig7
    fig8
    fig9
    fig10
    fig11
    fig12
  • 6. Derivative interpolation of those inflection points to form the 1st dynamic mean,
  • fig1
    fig2
    fig3
    fig4
    fig5
    fig6
    fig7
    fig8
    fig9
    fig10
    fig11
    fig12
  • 7. Inflection points of the 1st dynamic mean,
  • fig1
    fig2
    fig3
    fig4
    fig5
    fig6
    fig7
    fig8
    fig9
    fig10
    fig11
    fig12
  • 8. Derivative interpolation based on inflection points of 1st dynamic mean to form the 2nd,
  • fig1
    fig2
    fig3
    fig4
    fig5
    fig6
    fig7
    fig8
    fig9
    fig10
    fig11
    fig12
  • 9. Comparing the 2nd dynamic mean with the long period sine curve.Comparison of original with thereconstruction
  • fig1
    fig2
    fig3
    fig4
    fig5
    fig6
    fig7
    fig8
    fig9
    fig10
    fig11
    fig12
  • 10. Comparing the 1st derivatives of the 2nd dynamic mean and the long period sin curve,
  • fig1
    fig2
    fig3
    fig4
    fig5
    fig6
    fig7
    fig8
    fig9
    fig10
    fig11
    fig12
  • 11. Comparing the residual of the 2nd dynamic mean and the 1st with the medium period sin curve,
  • fig1
    fig2
    fig3
    fig4
    fig5
    fig6
    fig7
    fig8
    fig9
    fig10
    fig11
    fig12
  • 12. Comparing the residual of the 1st dynamic mean and the short period sin curve



  • back to the DR main page